Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 344482

Summary:	More validation would make using eef way more confortable
Product:	[Modeling] EEF	Reporter:	Romain Guider <romain.guider>
Component:	General	Assignee:	EEF Inbox <emft.eef-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	minor
Priority:	P3	CC:	stephane.begaudeau
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:

Description Romain Guider

2011-05-02 12:19:12 EDT

Build Identifier: Validation problems

 The validation doesn't report when a representation is missing in the
 Container attached to the View element. This is confusing because the
 generated code doesn't compile and the relation between the cause and
 the effect isn't that obvious!

 Duplicate naming of Views under the Category aren't reported by the
 validator and result in erroneous code generation.


Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Stephane Begaudeau

2016-05-30 11:34:16 EDT

The Eclipse EEF team has worked over the past few months on a brand new runtime using a reflective approach which can be used more easily with Eclipse Sirius. Since we do not plan to continue to work on the old runtime and its code generation approach, I will close this issue for now.

If you want to contribute, you can reopen this issue and submit a contribution to the project thanks to our Gerrit: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/admin/projects/eef/org.eclipse.eef