| Summary: | illegal API use in org.eclipse.emf.facet.infra.query.ui.wizards.NewQueryClassWizardPage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Nicolas Bros <nicolas.bros> | ||||
| Component: | EMF-Facet | Assignee: | Gregoire Dupe <gdupe> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P1 | CC: | Ed.Merks, emft.facet-inbox, gdupe | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | gdupe:
indigo+
Ed.Merks: pmc_approved+ |
||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Nicolas Bros
Created attachment 197404 [details] Patch for Bug 344246 Hi, Please find attached an simpler wizardPage implementation for EMF Facet Java query creation. (a) I, Nicolas Guyomar, wrote 100% of the code I've provided. (b) I have the right to contribute the code to Eclipse. (c) I contribute the content under the EPL. (d) This contribution contains no Cryptography features. Regards, Nicolas Guyomar Hello Ed, Here is a patch fixing the illegal use of org.eclipse.jdt.ui.wizards.NewClassWizardPage by a EMF Facet 0.1 component. Cf. http://download.eclipse.org/facet/downloads/drops/0.1.0/R201106070516/api_report/html/org.eclipse.jdt.ui%20%283.7.0%29/org.eclipse.jdt.ui.wizards.NewClassWizardPage.html Do you agree to apply this patch in the service release? Regards, Gregoire Comment on attachment 197404 [details] Patch for Bug 344246 Here is a contribution from one employee of Mia-Software, targeting future Indigo release. The company has signed a Member Commiter Agreement. The contribution does not need a CQ (see bug 322327). I've committed this contribution in the branch 0.1. Committed revision 801. Comment on attachment 197404 [details] Patch for Bug 344246 (In reply to comment #3) > I've committed this contribution in the branch 0.1. > Committed revision 801. The revision 801 was a commit on the trunk. I've committed in the branch 0_1 in the revision 804. This bug can be mark as resolved. This bug can be closed. (In reply to comment #6) > This bug can be closed. So I close this bug. |