| Summary: | Field labels should use the item provider label instead of the feature name | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] EEF | Reporter: | Julien Dupont <julien.dupont> |
| Component: | General | Assignee: | EEF Inbox <emft.eef-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | P1 | CC: | goulwen.lefur, mariot.chauvin |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | mariot.chauvin:
indigo+
|
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Julien Dupont
To be more specific, EEF should use the label provided by EMF generated item providers and not directly from the feature name. I agree with the need but I set it severity on major since it's not blocker for EEF Users FIXED: in EEF 1.1 with the ViewHelper Closed |