| Summary: | Support element property in the master details content outline | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Ling Hao <ling.hao> |
| Component: | Sapphire | Assignee: | Konstantin Komissarchik <konstantin> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | konstantin |
| Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | plan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Ling Hao
Enhancement implemented. Added example to the gallery sample and sections to what's new and migration docs. Please verify. In my case I have 11 different occupations. And each occupation there may be various number (zero, one or more) of child nodes. It would be a lot easier for my test case if each <node-factory> is for <property> and <model-element-type> pair. Or at the minimum, there should be an option to not show the node for a model-element-type. > In my case I have 11 different occupations. And each occupation there may be
> various number (zero, one or more) of child nodes. It would be a lot easier for
> my test case if each <node-factory> is for <property> and <model-element-type>
> pair. Or at the minimum, there should be an option to not show the node for a
> model-element-type.
I do not comprehend the above statements. The semantics are identical to how lists are handled. I am not sure what you are trying to achieve.
Now I've got it! Works great, thanks! |