| Summary: | Source files created in active task context are removed from context | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Stephen Williams <gingasteve> |
| Component: | Mylyn | Assignee: | Mylyn Inbox <mylyn-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Stephen Williams
Stephen, please see bug 341631. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 341631 *** Hi Steffen I've read through the other bug report and I am not completely clear on whether or not Mylyn is behaving as I would expect it to behave. To restate my question as simply as possible, files created / modified as part of a task do seem to be subject to decay and eventual removal from the task context - is this a bug or by design? If it is by design, that is a problem as, if I add a new file or modify an existing file while a task is active, that file will always be relevant to that task and should never be automatically removed. Regards Stephen > To restate my question as simply as possible, files created / modified as part > of a task do seem to be subject to decay and eventual removal from the task > context - is this a bug or by design? Yes, this is by design. Files do not actually get removed but the are filtered from focused views when their interest level falls below a certain threshold. > If it is by design, that is a problem as, if I add a new file or modify an > existing file while a task is active, that file will always be relevant to that > task and should never be automatically removed. Elements that are modified get a higher interest level than elements that are selected only so it takes much longer for their interest to decay below the threshold. Still, when working on a task for a long time you may end up editing many files and focused views would become overloaded without decay. Also see bug 178891 for a related discussion. It would be helpful if you added your statements to bug 341631 so they doesn't get lost. |