Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 342373

Summary:

provide history implementation for Bugzilla

Product:

z_Archived

Reporter:

Steffen Pingel <steffen.pingel>

Component:

Mylyn

Assignee:

Steffen Pingel <steffen.pingel>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Frank Becker <eclipse>

Severity:

enhancement

Priority:

CC:

eclipse, robert.elves, shawn.minto

Version:

unspecified

Target Milestone:

3.6

Hardware:

All

OS:

All

Whiteboard:

Bug Depends on:

142906

Bug Blocks:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
patch	none
mylyn/context/zip	none

Description Steffen Pingel

2011-04-10 13:01:26 EDT

The Bugzilla connector should provide access to the change history of task by implementing the API that was added as part of bug 142906.

Comment 1 Steffen Pingel

2011-04-10 13:08:15 EDT

Created attachment 192902 [details]
patch

Comment 2 Steffen Pingel

2011-04-10 13:08:17 EDT

Created attachment 192903 [details]
mylyn/context/zip

Comment 3 Steffen Pingel

2011-04-10 13:09:56 EDT

I have committed the attached implementation which uses XML-RPC. Frank, if you get a chance it would be great if you could review.

I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history package or if we should delete that?

Comment 4 Frank Becker

2011-04-16 13:54:32 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
> I have committed the attached implementation which uses XML-RPC. Frank, if you
> get a chance it would be great if you could review.

Review done!
I found nothing that we need to change.

> 
> I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history package
> or if we should delete that?

I think we can delete this. We can use some parts if we want to have a version that works without XMLRPC.

Do you think we should as the eclipse webmaster to activate XMLRPC?

Comment 5 Steffen Pingel

2011-05-22 16:18:37 EDT

(In reply to comment #4)
> > I am wondering if we still need the o.e.m.internal.bugzilla.core.history
> package
> > or if we should delete that?
> 
> I think we can delete this. We can use some parts if we want to have a version
> that works without XMLRPC.

Makes sense to me. Can you file a bug to do that for 3.7?

> Do you think we should as the eclipse webmaster to activate XMLRPC?

Unfortunately that request has been turned down in the past: bug 266901.

I'll leave this open for now as a reminder to add a few tests.

Comment 6 Steffen Pingel

2011-05-30 19:21:52 EDT

Marking resolved.