| Summary: | Synchronize view nodes should follow UI convention and have Expand All action | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Technology] EGit | Reporter: | Timo Kinnunen <timo.kinnunen> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | Project Inbox <egit.ui-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | dariusz.luksza, Knut.Friedhelm, matthias.sohn, pawelec_p |
| Version: | 0.11 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Timo Kinnunen
That's great that I found your post in here. Your workaround works and is very very usefull for me :) (In reply to comment #0) > A workaround requires double-clicking the node text. This does not mirror the > behavior of the Project Explorer view where double-clicking a node expands only > one level. Also, the expansion is instantaneous in the Project Explorer view, > but slower and "stepped" using the workaround, making it feel like a hack. > > The workaround is easy only if you discover it. This isn't a workaround, this is a know feature. Same feature you can find in "default" Synchronization View implementation in CVS plugin. Of course an "Expand All" context menu option also should be implemented, but is has a very low priority currently. It wasn't known to me :) I used svn before, there is "expand all". Now, when I know about it, I agree about low priority. Best regards Paweł I discovered that feature by reading this Bugzilla. My expectation was that double-clicking the node name would have done the same as single-clicking the little arrowhead next to it, i.e. Expand [one level], therefore I never tried it on my own. When adding the action please also consider adding a tool bar button (as this is done in the subversion integration). - this has been implemented in http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,2424 - merged as 79e459f8c73653a0f191c8af4f3f65479a0fdeef What about Git Tree Compare View. I found this feature and I think it is very usefull. Is there any chance to add this same functionality there? |