| Summary: | "open with ...": editor should abide user's decision about file type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [WebTools] WTP Source Editing | Reporter: | arne anka <eclipse-bugs> |
| Component: | wst.html | Assignee: | wst.html <wst.html-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Nick Sandonato <nsand.dev> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | thatnitind |
| Version: | 3.2.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
arne anka
i knew about that already, but that's no solution, it's not even a workaround. if i say "open this file as an html file", the editor has to do that. i can't for a single file i get add just another association, just because the editor is to stupid or stubborn to do what _i_ want. i get that file with a "could you please quickly look into it" and i need to define a new association just for that single file? you must be kidding! associations are nice for extensions i get often, but if the editor in bad old microsoft-style relies on the file extension instead of being either smart and recognize the type or at least follow a user's instructions, then it is broken. period. The problem you've run into is an architectural limitation for which no solution currently exists. The surrounding systems in Eclipse won't acknowledge that file extension as one for HTML by default (nor should they as the set of elements with the "asp" prefix would be reported as unknown tags). A documented workaround *has* been given, but we'll continue to pursue a more streamlined version with bug 320996. that's at least an _useful_ answer! i got to insist, though, that the given "workaround" is _not_ a workaround for the issue! |