| Summary: | should we switch from # to #! | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [ECD] Orion | Reporter: | Susan McCourt <susan> |
| Component: | Client | Assignee: | Project Inbox <orion.client-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | bokowski, simon_kaegi |
| Version: | 0.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Susan McCourt
This would require following the spec that Google put forward for using hashbang instead of hash. We can talk more about this but I'm not so sure. You typically use hash-bang for URI to the real content so that search engines can recognize the difference between pages that unique "internal" content vs. a sub-section of a resource. In our case we don't actually host the content so it's not an internal address to something otherwise not viewable as other than relative case we use the full URI. I don't think we'd care about an external search engine indexing your workspace anyway - it's inevitably going to be stale. |