Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [Proposal] technology.koneki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> | ||||||||||
| Component: | Proposals and Reviews | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> | ||||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | admin, b.kolb, contact, dsciamma, gmorice, gunnar, kkinfoo, mober.at+eclipse, sbernard | ||||||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||
| URL: | http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/technology.koneki | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
Created attachment 191123 [details]
new interested party + typo + <pre> alignment
Wayne, could you please apply the attached patch?
There only is one new Interested Party but I mostly needed to fix a typo in Kai Kreuzer's name.
Thanks!
PS: the <pre> section has been re-indented on purpose
Patch applied. Source formatter screwed up the <pre> section; I'll have to avoid using that feature... Thanks Wayne FYI I did screwed up the <pre> section in the first place (using the formatter as well) :) Created attachment 192798 [details]
new mentors and interested parties
Hi Wayne!
Can you please update the proposal with the attached patch?
BTW, the new Projects page looks great! :)
(In reply to comment #4) > Can you please update the proposal with the attached patch? Applied. > BTW, the new Projects page looks great! :) Flattery works. Created attachment 193911 [details]
last update before creation review :)
Created attachment 193912 [details]
image needed by previous patch
Hello :) Can you please update the Koneki proposal with the attached patch (with the attached image as well, to be put in the 'images/' folder)? Then, I would like you to schedule the Creation Review but I was wondering if I should get a +1 from Technology PMC beforehand, given that it is an Incubator project? Thanks! (In reply to comment #8) > Hello :) > Can you please update the Koneki proposal with the attached patch (with the > attached image as well, to be put in the 'images/' folder)? Done > Then, I would like you to schedule the Creation Review but I was wondering if I > should get a +1 from Technology PMC beforehand, given that it is an Incubator > project? +1 from the Technology PMC (and I've copied the PMC Lead) I have initiated a trademark search with the IP team. We have to wait for the results of that before we can schedule the creation review. Trademark assignment completed. Suggesting May 4-11/2011 for the creation review. Created and provisioned. Drat! Marking as FIXED. |