| Summary: | [Security] Reporting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> |
| Component: | Architecture Council | Assignee: | eclipse.org-architecture-council |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Ed.Merks, gunnar, remy.suen |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://eclipse.org/security/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 343743 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 337004 | ||
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
(In reply to comment #0) > How do we handle bugs from a user who doesn't know what project to report > against? Should we make a "security" email alias that forward to a trusted > "inner circle" (you'll find that I use this term a lot) who can do the initial > triage? I like that idea. The "inner circle" can identify the project and eventually the initial classification. The more I think about it, the more I think this should be the *promoted* way of reporting security issues. A reporting link/form could be provided on www.eclipse.org. What about security@eclipse.org? Should it be possible to report issues via mail or just Bugzilla? I believe that the Security Team will be the inner circle. I have included links for security@eclipse.org as a means of reporting a vulnerability. I declare victory. |