| Summary: | Use shared license in features | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [RT] RAP | Reporter: | Ralf Sternberg <rsternberg> |
| Component: | Releng | Assignee: | Project Inbox <rap-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | 1.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Ralf Sternberg
This approach would allow us to keep the license text in a shared feature. However, it would require an additional feature (the "license feature"). Given the small number of features in RAP, I currently think that shared licenses would not really simplify matters for us. It's just another indirection. Looking at the License Consistency report for Kepler [1], all our licenses are up to date. [1] http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/licenseConsistency.html |