| Summary: | Update plan to RHEL 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | John Arthorne <john.arthorne> |
| Component: | PMC | Assignee: | John Arthorne <john.arthorne> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert, Mike_Wilson, overholt, Silenio_Quarti |
| Version: | 3.7 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 3.7 M7 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
John Arthorne
There are really three questions here: - Do we add RHEL 6 as a reference platform - Do we remove RHEL 5 - Do we remove RHEL 4 I thought we typically just listed the "latest" release of a given OS so I'm not sure why we have RHEL 4 listed at all. Was there an issue at some point in the past about 64-bit support on RHEL 5? I think the default decision should be add RHEL 6 and remove 4/5. For SLES and Ubuntu we only list the latest one. I checked with SWT and they haven't got a machine with the final RHEL 6 release yet, although they have done some testing on a beta. We should at least wait for them to do more thorough testing on RHEL 6 final before we move up. At the January 21 PMC meeting we agreed to change the RHEL reference platform to 6 (dropping RHEL 4 and 5). http://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse/PMC I will update this in the next plan revision. Since this is already mentioned in bug 341264 I will mark this as a dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 341264 *** |