Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 334382

Summary: Provide preference to be prompted again deleting conditional breakpoints
Product: [Eclipse Project] JDT Reporter: Michael Rennie <Michael_Rennie>
Component: DebugAssignee: Dani Megert <daniel_megert>
Status: VERIFIED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P3 CC: curtis.windatt.public, daniel_megert, markus.kell.r, pawel.1.piech
Version: 3.7   
Target Milestone: 3.7 M5   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Fix none

Description Michael Rennie CLA 2011-01-14 09:57:33 EST
FUP to bug 151918

151918 provides a handy dialog to warn you if you are about to delete a conditional breakpoint. The problem comes in when you check the 'don't ask me again' option - there is no way to be prompted again.

We should add an option to the Run/Debug preference page to allow users to be prompted again if they so choose. We already have preferences on that page to undo other 'don't ask me again' options.
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2011-01-14 10:29:15 EST
(In reply to comment #0)
> We should add an option to the Run/Debug preference page to allow users to be
> prompted again if they so choose. We already have preferences on that page to
> undo other 'don't ask me again' options.
The prompting is completely implemented in JDT, so that would have to go to the JDT > Debug page. Honestly, I think this is a bit overkill but if you really want this, I can do it.
Comment 2 Michael Rennie CLA 2011-01-17 10:29:50 EST
(In reply to comment #1)
> The prompting is completely implemented in JDT, so that would have to go to the
> JDT > Debug page. Honestly, I think this is a bit overkill but if you really
> want this, I can do it.

I think it would be good to have.
Comment 3 Dani Megert CLA 2011-01-17 10:31:07 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > The prompting is completely implemented in JDT, so that would have to go to the
> > JDT > Debug page. Honestly, I think this is a bit overkill but if you really
> > want this, I can do it.
> 
> I think it would be good to have.
Fair enough!
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2011-01-17 11:33:57 EST
Created attachment 186922 [details]
Fix
Comment 5 Dani Megert CLA 2011-01-17 11:34:23 EST
Fixed in HEAD.
Available in builds >= N20110117-2000.
Comment 6 Pawel Piech CLA 2011-05-06 17:28:48 EDT
Verified through testing.