Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 332514

Summary:	Remove Swordfish contribution
Product:	[Technology] EPP	Reporter:	Zsolt Beothy-Elo <zsolt.beothy-elo>
Component:	soa-package	Assignee:	Project Inbox <epp.packager-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	ian.skerrett, zsolt.beothy-elo
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	1.3.0
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
Whiteboard:

Description Zsolt Beothy-Elo

2010-12-14 07:00:16 EST

The swordfish project decided to leave the Indigo release train [1] and announced it on the cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [2]. As a consequence David disabled the Swordfish contribution in the Indigo build. We therefore also need to remove the Swordfish related features asap from the SOA package. The relevant features are:
- org.eclipse.swordfish.tooling.development.feature
- org.eclipse.swordfish.tooling.deployment.feature  
- org.eclipse.swordfish.tutorial.discovery.feature

[1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/swordfish-dev/msg00421.html
[2] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg05050.html

Comment 1 Ian Skerrett

2010-12-14 08:41:37 EST

(In reply to comment #0)
> The swordfish project decided to leave the Indigo release train [1] and
> announced it on the cross-project-issues-dev mailing list [2]. As a consequence
> David disabled the Swordfish contribution in the Indigo build. We therefore
> also need to remove the Swordfish related features asap from the SOA package.
> The relevant features are:
> - org.eclipse.swordfish.tooling.development.feature
> - org.eclipse.swordfish.tooling.deployment.feature  
> - org.eclipse.swordfish.tutorial.discovery.feature
> 
> [1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/swordfish-dev/msg00421.html
> [2] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg05050.html

If we remove Swordfish from this package what is left in the package?   Should we just stop building the entire package?

Zsolt you are also listed as the package maintainer.  Are you still performing that role or will someone else take it on; if the package remains for Indigo.

Comment 2 Zsolt Beothy-Elo

2010-12-14 08:57:02 EST

(In reply to comment #1)

> 
> If we remove Swordfish from this package what is left in the package?   Should
> we just stop building the entire package?

Might be an option, but I first want to discuss this with the SOA IWG. The IWG is the owner of th epackage, so I first want to discuss this topic with the members of the IWG, especially with Scott Lewis. ECF remote services are also part of the EPP package.

> 
> Zsolt you are also listed as the package maintainer.  Are you still performing
> that role or will someone else take it on; if the package remains for Indigo.
As long as we do not know in which direction to move I will stay and maintain it. Afterwards we might look for some volunteers.

Comment 3 Markus Knauer

2011-05-20 12:28:20 EDT

AFAIK (and I should know that!) we do not build the SOA package for the Indigo release any more.
I am closing this bug as 'FIXED'. Seems to be a new meaning for FIXED, but from a bug point of view it sounds correct. ;-)