Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 332483

Summary:

[help] Add org.eclipse.rap.ui.serviceHandler to RAP EP reference

Product:

[RT] RAP

Reporter:

Elias Volanakis <elias>

Component:

Tools

Assignee:

Project Inbox <rap-inbox>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

normal

Priority:

Version:

1.4

Target Milestone:

1.4 M5

Hardware:

OS:

Windows Vista

Whiteboard:

sr132

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Patch	none

Description Elias Volanakis

2010-12-13 17:29:59 EST

The extension point 'org.eclipse.rap.ui.serviceHandler' is missing from the RAP Extension Point Reference. (added in 1.3 M7).

Please update. :-)

Comment 1 Elias Volanakis

2010-12-13 17:51:36 EST

Created attachment 185099 [details]
Patch

Patch against org.eclipse.rap.ui.help.

Note: not sure where help/html/reference/extension-points/org_eclipse_rap_ui_serviceHandler.html comes from / should be. I assume it is generated?

Comment 2 Elias Volanakis

2010-12-14 17:56:51 EST

One closely related point to discuss:

From my POV we should add *all* extension points from o.e.rap.ui to the help. The rationale is that if somebody starts with RAP without knowing RCP they may not be aware that there is o.e.views / perspectives / etc. in there.

Comment 3 Elias Volanakis

2011-01-07 10:32:20 EST

ping...

Comment 4 Ralf Sternberg

2011-01-11 16:19:12 EST

Thanks for the patch, Elias. Applied it to both CVS HEAD and 1.3 maintenance branch.

Comment 5 Ralf Sternberg

2011-01-11 16:24:26 EST

(In reply to comment #2)
> From my POV we should add *all* extension points from o.e.rap.ui to the help.
> The rationale is that if somebody starts with RAP without knowing RCP they may
> not be aware that there is o.e.views / perspectives / etc. in there.

The RCP extension point documentation is part of the Eclipse help already, namely of the Platform Plug-in Developer Guide. I don't think it's a good idea to replicate this content in the RAP developer guide. Could linking be an improvement? If you have a strong opinion about this, please open a separate bug.