| Summary: | Committing non workspace changes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Technology] EGit | Reporter: | Jens Baumgart <jens.baumgart> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Project Inbox <egit.core-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, dugueperoux.esteban, esteban.dugueperoux, gunnar, leachbj, matthias.sohn, michael, pwebster, waste.manager |
| Version: | 0.10.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0.0 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Jens Baumgart
(In reply to comment #0) > PROPOSALS > ========= > > 1. Extend the commit dialog to show / commit ALL changes in the Git repository. > > 2. Introduce the relevant Git actions (add, rm, ...) in the Git Repositories > View in the working directory tree. > This would allow to perform Git operations on files which are not in the > workspace. +1 I remember myself looking for (2) some time ago. It just makes sense to perform some (most?) repo operations from the repositories view. I even wonder if there are operations that don't make sense for single projects but in the repositories view? +1 for both proposals Can I point out that as it stands EGit simply has nothing analogous to performing "git status" on the command line which takes a repository wide view (regardless of what is in Eclipse Projects) and is of course fundamental to working with git. I also like the idea of adding something to do this to Repository View. (In reply to comment #3) > Can I point out that as it stands EGit simply has nothing analogous to > performing "git status" on the command line which takes a repository wide view > (regardless of what is in Eclipse Projects) and is of course fundamental to > working with git. Then you maybe want to review http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,3106 Though this still doesn't support non-workspace resources but I asked Bernard if he could add this. http://egit.eclipse.org/r/#change,3369 implements committing non workspace changes. Wondering why this is still New. It seems like this is already implemented. Fixed with commit 2f724143881b110bff53983df9ccf1d88366acc1. |