Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Move TCF to tools.cdt.tcf | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] Target Management | Reporter: | Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | dsdp.tm.core-inbox <tm.core-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Martin Oberhuber <mober.at+eclipse> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, emo, eugene, sharon.corbett, webmaster |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 327949, 330336, 352736 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 325892, 326575 | ||
|
Description
Wayne Beaton
The new project has been provisioned. Doug and Martin, can you please detail the steps necessary to move TCF to the new tools.cdt.tcf project on this bug? Thanks gang! I've reached out to the community to put together a plan. Please don't eliminate anything from the DSDP area until we signal it here. This may take a few months to complete as there is product development happening closely downstream and we don't want to adversely affect the adopters. As a first step, can you change the ownership of the current SVN files to the new user group. Thanks! We can't do this piecemeal. We can be flexible on the timing, but this will work way better if you can detail all the moving parts and then we can unleash the webmaster and Sharon on the implementation. AFAIK, the new set of committers is a subset of the TM committers, right? Step 2 is likely weeks away, so I'd prefer we focus on step 1 for now. The committer list is not a subset. I am to be added in the new list. That's why I'm requesting it be done now. ping. Just want to make sure this action hasn't been dropped. We're working it out. We should be back to you shortly. Done. -M. Thanks Matt. To clarify: You've provisioned the new project, but have left the code in its current location for the time being, correct? Excellent. Thanks Matt. It's all good Wayne. From an IP perspective: 1. Any TCF applicable Ipzilla CQs will need to be moved. I can arrange the movement of those as soon as they are identified. 2. Our records indicate TCF was dual licensed (EPL/EDL). I just want to ensure everyone is aware of this. 3. Any TCF Committers remaining in DSDP TM and who were not included in the TCF NPPR, should be identified so we do not lose site of the fact they need to be removed from TCF access when the time is right. Thanks, Sharon (In reply to comment #11) > 1. I can arrange the movement of those as soon as they are identified. See http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/Restructuring_Review#Initial_Contribution > 2. Our records indicate TCF was dual licensed (EPL/EDL). Actually not all of TCF, but only the plain C agent code is dual licensed: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2519 > 3. Any TCF Committers remaining in DSDP TM and who were not included in the TCF > NPPR, should be identified so we do not lose site of the fact they need to be > removed from TCF access when the time is right. As per http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/Restructuring_Review#Initial_Committers , these are committers to be deactivated from "new" TCF: David Dykstal David McKnight Xuan Chen Kevin Doyle Radoslav Gerganov Michael Scharf Committer access to TCF is in place as per NPPR received Oct 15/10. Committer access changes with respect to TM for Eugene and Felix will be addressed via bug 330336 RE TMs move to Tools. IPzilla CQs, as identified, have been realigned accordingly within IPzilla. Webmaster; over to you.... Thanks, Sharon IP Team So what do I need to do here? -M. Nothing yet. I'll ping you when we're ready. Are we any closer to having a 'when' for this? -M. The only thing left that we're still using in the old spot is the SVN repo and I don't think I want to move that until after Indigo when we'll likely move it over to git. I'll take a pass through everything else and make sure they're in a state to archive. With TCF becoming a project of its own, should it also get a homepage of its own? For now, the this page just is a template: http://eclipse.org/tcf/ I guess it should at least redirect to the older TCF FAQ: http://wiki.eclipse.org/TCF then at some point this bug should probably be closed... There's still the big item of moving the source out of svnroot/dsdp. Once that's done, I'll do a pass through everything and update this defect. (In reply to comment #18) > With TCF becoming a project of its own, should it also get a homepage of its > own? For now, the this page just is a template: > http://eclipse.org/tcf/ > > I guess it should at least redirect to the older TCF FAQ: > http://wiki.eclipse.org/TCF > > then at some point this bug should probably be closed... You might consider using the new-fangled generated home page: http://eclipse.org/projects/project.php?id=tools.cdt.tcf Just a thought. (In reply to comment #19) > There's still the big item of moving the source out of svnroot/dsdp. Once > that's done, I'll do a pass through everything and update this defect. Great! TCF moved to git today, so I assume we can declare "mission completed" on this? (In reply to comment #21) > TCF moved to git today, so I assume we can declare "mission completed" on this? Yes. Marking resolved. |