| Summary: | [code analysis] Bad function name incorrectly reported on constructor and destructor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Olexiy Buyanskyy <olexiyb> |
| Component: | cdt-codan | Assignee: | Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, malaperle |
| Version: | 8.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 8.0 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Olexiy Buyanskyy
It is not just that, the "function" name it is using contains class name for some reason, meaning it would mark all the methods fixed. Also added checker parameter to check for method names (vs c functions only) *** cdt cvs genie on behalf of elaskavaia *** Bug 327710 convinience method [*] AbstractCheckerWithProblemPreferences.java 1.7 http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.cdt/codan/org.eclipse.cdt.codan.core/src/org/eclipse/cdt/codan/core/model/AbstractCheckerWithProblemPreferences.java?root=Tools_Project&r1=1.6&r2=1.7 [*] NamingConventionFunctionChecker.java 1.10 http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.cdt/codan/org.eclipse.cdt.codan.checkers/src/org/eclipse/cdt/codan/internal/checkers/NamingConventionFunctionChecker.java?root=Tools_Project&r1=1.9&r2=1.10 In the isFilteredArg javadoc : argumnet -> argument. |