| Summary: | [Net] Network Connections preferences page has a UI that's difficult to understand | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Eleanor Joslin <ejj-eclipsebugs> |
| Component: | Team | Assignee: | Platform Team Inbox <platform-team-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | francisu, hanriseldon, pascal, remy.suen, tmm-bugs.eclipse, wojciech.galanciak |
| Version: | 3.5.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Eleanor Joslin
Yep this is true, but to be really honest, this code is dormant so without any contribution this will go nowhere. (In reply to comment #1) > Yep this is true, but to be really honest, this code is dormant so without any > contribution this will go nowhere. Pascal, I thought this page was owned by the Team project, not UI. Was it moved? *** Bug 327589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #2) > Pascal, I thought this page was owned by the Team project, not UI. Was it > moved? Team owns this code. Pascal probably hit the browser/bugzilla problem where you make changes to a bug but your combo is still the original stuff (UI) after I already changed it (to Team) so your (supposedly) single comment submission ends up rolling back values like component and version numbers. This bug is related to bug 306630 It focues more on checkboxes in proxy list but they show that this page is unintuitive. It is not heavy used - user (if uses proxy) visits it occasionally so it should be clear and readable. I think that considering to make it similar to browser/system pages is a good idea. Unfortunately, we provide more information than, e.g. page in Windows, so we need to fit this additional data into the same layout and it may be a problem. I made investigation around possible changes in this page and it is not possible to use web browser UI approach. The old UI was based on it (see 3.4 and older) and it was not good. In this situation this bug is a duplicate of bug 306630, where work will be continued on the main issue which are confusing checkboxes. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 306630 *** |