| Summary: | Update JRE recommendation on download page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | John Arthorne <john.arthorne> |
| Component: | Website | Assignee: | phoenix.ui <phoenix.ui-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | bugs, wayne.beaton |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
John Arthorne
+1 Given that Java 6 was released in December 2006, and that Java 5 entered End-of-Life status in April 2008 and has been unsupported since October 2009 (reference: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html), shouldn't it be "Java SE 6 or greater is recommended"? (Or maybe just "Java SE 6 is recommended", in order to not encourage Java 7, which doesn't have an official release yet?) Besides the right-hand comment mentioned in comment #0, this also affects http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/moreinfo/jre.php . I've updated the two pages, /downloads and /downloads/moreinfo/jre to use text along the lines of what John suggested. While I was at it, I updated the contents of the JRE page to reflect the reference platform story for 3.6.2. John, do you agree with Mark's comments about Java 6? Strictly speaking, I think we are compatible with Java SE 5... (In reply to comment #4) > John, do you agree with Mark's comments about Java 6? Not really... Those are only statements about Oracle's VM. We support a variety of VM vendors and versions, and some platforms we support don't even have an Oracle VM. Most visitors to the main download page will be consuming Helios releases, which have a variety of Java 5 and Java 6 reference platforms. For the Indigo release (June 2011), our reference platforms will be entirely Java 6 or greater, so it would be fair to make that change once Indigo is released. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > John, do you agree with Mark's comments about Java 6? > > Not really... Those are only statements about Oracle's VM. We support a variety > of VM vendors and versions, and some platforms we support don't even have an > Oracle VM. It looks like we're done here. I'm marking as FIXED. Mark, feel free to reopen if you feel that we haven't adequately addressed the issue. Everything looks good - thanks! |