| Summary: | [releng][p2] consume ECF build for 3.6.1 maintenance | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Equinox | Reporter: | Scott Lewis <slewis> | ||||||
| Component: | p2 | Assignee: | Pascal Rapicault <pascal> | ||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | dj.houghton, kim.moir, markus.kell.r, pascal, remy.suen, tjwatson | ||||||
| Version: | 3.6.1 | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | 3.6.2 | ||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Scott Lewis
I have released this in the 3.6.x branch and updated the map file. Released in HEAD as well. Thomas: it might be more appropriate and productive to put the review flag on bug 316500, as that's the (only) source bug for this update. Further, you might want to have bug 316500 reviewed by some of the people that implemented the code (i.e. Matt or others). (In reply to comment #2) > Released in HEAD as well. This causes problems in Javadoc generation: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/N20100906-2000/compilelogs/platform.doc.isv.javadoc.txt You have to update the versions in /org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/platformOptions.txt Also, it looks wrong to me that many of the bundles got v20100906-1425 as qualifier but didn't increase the service segment. Given the questions about this bug I was a bit hasty in my +1. I think we need to sort though the issues and defer to 3.6.2. I have asked DJ to pull this change out of the maintenance stream until we can sort through the issues. In the future we need to get PMC approval before releasing any more fixes to 3.6.1. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Released in HEAD as well. > > This causes problems in Javadoc generation: > http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/N20100906-2000/compilelogs/platform.doc.isv.javadoc.txt > You have to update the versions in > /org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/platformOptions.txt This has nothing to do with ECF...as I don't have access to these files...it's something the platform team must deal with. > > Also, it looks wrong to me that many of the bundles got v20100906-1425 as > qualifier but didn't increase the service segment. True...the only change was to org.eclipse.ecf.ssl bundle, so it's service segment was updated. The others haven't changed. >I have asked DJ to pull this change out of the maintenance stream until we can >sort through the issues. In the future we need to get PMC approval before >releasing any more fixes to 3.6.1. Thomas...my comment about this is: if we can't get a single, close to trivial fix (i.e. bug 316500) reviewed by the people responsible for this code (IBM...see comments 4 and 5 on bug 316500), and successfully into a maintenance build in a matter of days, then it indicates to me that something is *wrong* with this process. (In reply to comment #7) > Thomas...my comment about this is: if we can't get a single, close to trivial > fix (i.e. bug 316500) reviewed by the people responsible for this code > (IBM...see comments 4 and 5 on bug 316500), and successfully into a maintenance > build in a matter of days, then it indicates to me that something is *wrong* > with this process. I am sorry for the slow response on the bug, I have been trying to track Matt down for some time now. So there is something wrong there. But the fact is this bug does not appear to be critical and does not look like a good candidate for SR1 to me given the very late stage we are at with the RC builds for SR1. Sorry for the delay in this Scott. I will release the updated bundles to 3.6.2 tomorrow and coordinate with Kim so she can update the javadoc options file. Created attachment 186509 [details]
patch
Patch released to r36x stream. Created attachment 186560 [details]
patch
|