| Summary: | [New Assembly directive] Check box option to assemble projects into WEB-INF/lib is confusing | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [WebTools] WTP Java EE Tools | Reporter: | Ram Venkataswamy <ram.venkataswamy> | ||||
| Component: | jst.j2ee | Assignee: | Konstantin Komissarchik <konstantin> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Chuck Bridgham <cbridgha> | ||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cbridgha, ccc, jsholl, konstantin, stryker | ||||
| Version: | 3.2 | Keywords: | plan | ||||
| Target Milestone: | 3.3 M3 | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Ram Venkataswamy
The real question here is whether the add project reference wizard needs to have this checkbox at all. All it does it toggle between "WEB-INF/lib" and "/" as the initial deploy path. None of the other add wizards offer ability to influence deploy path right from the wizard. I propose that for consistency sake, this option be removed from the add project reference wizard. No functionality would be lost. The rare user that does want to map the jar somewhere other than WEB-INF/lib can make that selection in the deployment assembly page once the wizard completes. Let's consider this for Indigo. This is a good idea - less complication... removing an option nobody would ever want. - can you add a patch? I also think it's a good suggestion. The deployment assembly page does all that's needed. The checkbox adds nothing. Created attachment 181428 [details]
Patch v1
Ignore the changes to java compiler settings in the project. I am using 3.7 M2 as my dev eclipse and practically every java ee tools project has optional java validation things flagged as errors. I will not be releasing these setting changes as part of this fix. It will need to be looked at separately.
I agree; the less complicated the better. Do you think this is also worth pulling back to WTP 3.2.3? Released the patch to 3.3 M3 stream.
> Do you think this is also worth pulling back to WTP 3.2.3?
I am ambivalent on that. It's a fairly small improvement and being a UI change would require PMC approval... But it is perfectly safe and it is an improvement in usability. Let me know how you guys would like to go on this. I will back-port the patch (open a separate bug) if necessary.
Yes, could you please backport this for 3.2.3. Thanks. |