Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 321591

Summary:

[ComponentD] Minimum size of Components isn't really minimal

Product:

[Modeling] GMF-Tooling

Reporter:

Christian Waniek <chris.waniek>

Component:

Samples

Assignee:

Christian Waniek <chris.waniek>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

minor

Priority:

CC:

borlander, chris.waniek

Version:

unspecified

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
screenshot of unclear compoennt diagram	none
screenshot after patch	none
patch for this problem	none

Description Christian Waniek

2010-08-03 09:40:24 EDT

Build Identifier: 

If I want to model a more complex Component diagram, it becomes not clearly arranged very fast, because I'm not able to really minimize Components. (same for Artifacts).
Especially if you need Component Diagrams to communicate with a customer the diagrams have to be clearly arranged.

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Christian Waniek

2010-08-03 09:40:52 EDT

Created attachment 175777 [details]
screenshot of unclear compoennt diagram

Comment 2 Christian Waniek

2010-08-03 09:43:22 EDT

Created attachment 175778 [details]
screenshot after patch

this screenshot shows how the component diagram looks like after I have changed the FigureDescriptors. I'm now able to make Component- and Artifact-figures smaller.
So it is easier to draw clearly arranged diagrams.

Comment 3 Christian Waniek

2010-08-03 09:45:17 EDT

Created attachment 175779 [details]
patch for this problem

This Patch removes the minimum size constraints from the Component and Artifact figures.

Comment 4 Christian Waniek

2011-01-17 08:54:23 EST

The body of component figure does not have a minimum height anymore.