Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 321517

Summary: wst-sdk-R-3.2.1-20100730021206.zip missing top-level eclipse folder
Product: [WebTools] WTP Releng Reporter: Nitin Dahyabhai <thatnitind>
Component: relengAssignee: David Williams <david_williams>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact: David Williams <david_williams>
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3    
Version: 3.10   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows XP   
Whiteboard:

Description Nitin Dahyabhai CLA 2010-08-02 11:26:48 EDT
wst-sdk-R-3.2.1-20100730021206.zip doesn't have everything under an "eclipse" folder as most SDK zips are expected to:

[d:\wtp32]unzip -l wst-sdk-R-3.2.1-20100730021206.zip|head
Archive:  wst-sdk-R-3.2.1-20100730021206.zip
  Length      Date    Time    Name
---------  ---------- -----   ----
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common.fproj.sdk_3.2.1.v2
01007151559-787HDHApOGLZIPKbGXDV6I495B/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common.fproj.sdk_3.2.1.v2
01007151559-787HDHApOGLZIPKbGXDV6I495B/META-INF/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common.fproj_3.2.1.v20100
7151559-377A88s73533F5H384A/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common.fproj_3.2.1.v20100
7151559-377A88s73533F5H384A/META-INF/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common_core.feature.sourc
e_3.2.1.v201007071800-7B7DFEgF7RZHOZJ0X4OANJ/
        0  07-30-2010 03:00   features/org.eclipse.wst.common_core.feature.sourc
e_3.2.1.v201007071800-7B7DFEgF7RZHOZJ0X4OANJ/META-INF/
...
etc.
Comment 1 David Williams CLA 2010-08-03 03:10:23 EDT
I'm going to mark this as fixed, as I did fix the build scripts a few days ago (I noticed too, for coincidental reasons). 

I won't, right now, fix the actual zip files on download page. The reasoning is that this error also existed in the June release, and the fact that no one mentioned it I think indicates no one uses it. 

But, if it turns out we learn that some do need it, I can "manually" fix those on download page. Otherwise, it'll be correct for SR1. 

Thanks for reporting.