| Summary: | ETL parameterised equivalent(rule) causes array store exception | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] Epsilon | Reporter: | Colin Snook <cfs> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Dimitris Kolovos <dkolovos> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Macintosh | ||
| OS: | Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Colin Snook
Thanks for reporting this. I'll have a look at it and provide a fix shortly. Possibly related:- I also found a similar exception when adding a set of equivalents to a containment....e.g. machine.events.add(tbuml_model.signals.equivalent()); I did this instead which works... machine.events = tbuml_model.signals.equivalent(CORE!Event); machine.events.add(0,machine.initialisation(tbuml_model)); Fixed in the latest interim version. Fixed in 1.1 |