| Summary: | Dynamic Content Type Registry required | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] TMF | Reporter: | Ed Willink <ed> |
| Component: | Xtext | Assignee: | Project Inbox <tmf.xtext-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | moritz.eysholdt, sebastian.zarnekow |
| Version: | 1.0.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows Vista | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Ed Willink
Xtext actually re-uses EMF's contenttype/fileextension to ResourceFactory mapping... Exactly. EMF supports /plugin/ resource registration but not /resource/ registration. New mechanisms are needed to make things work in the current workspace. EMF provides dynmaic/reflective Ecore to support /resource/ model content. Tools provide diverse URI mapping to support /resource/ URI registration. Nothing yet supports /resource/ content type registration. Xtext relies on compiled parsers etc. I cannot image that this could work with a dynamic registry and reasonable effort / complexity / benefit tradeoff? Please reopen if I missed the point. |