| Summary: | the help doc about the -vm argument is not clear enough | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | redstun |
| Component: | Doc | Assignee: | Platform-Doc-Inbox <platform-doc-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | bokowski |
| Version: | 3.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | stalebug | ||
|
Description
redstun
So I guess I'm asking for change in both the doc and the message in the launcher. the current situation is a little messy. I feel that besides fixing the doc and error message, the code to find/locate the jvm launcher should be consolidated, probably the user should just pass in JAVA_HOME (such as c:\jdk) or JRE_HOME (such as c:\jdk\jre) to the -vm argument. Then the launcher should follow the jdk/jre directory layout to locate the jvm launcher. Regarding where to use the client vm or server vm, this should be decided by the -client/-server string passed to the -vmargs parameter. This way it's not necessary to ask for the c:\jdk\jre\bin\client, or c:\jdk\jre\bin\server to use the expected jvm.dll This way the situation would be dramatically simplified, IMHO. For this I change the Component to "Platform/IDE" although I mean "Platform/Launcher". Thanks The launcher belongs to the Equinox project. (No, there is no way for you to know this) This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're closing this bug. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it and reopen this bug. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |