| Summary: | Use URLImageDescriptor to load images | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] MAT | Reporter: | Benjamin Muskalla <b.muskalla> | ||||
| Component: | GUI | Assignee: | Project Inbox <mat.gui-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | minor | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | andrew_johnson | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Benjamin Muskalla
Created attachment 173223 [details]
patch
Patch
Good idea - thanks. To follow the Eclipse Legal Process, please can you confirm that you (a) wrote 100% of the code; (b) that you have the right to contribute the code to Eclipse; and that it is contributed under the Eclipse Public License. For part c, the file has already has license header, but I'll add your name as a contributor. (c) the file header contains the appropriate License header. a) yep b) yep c) thanks But I don't think I need to answer all these things as committer. I think only non-committers need to do that. I've applied and committed the patch. I think the committer status is on a project basis, so in the Eclipse legal process poster, figure 1 says "Written 100% by Submitting Committer or Committer on same Project under the supervision of the PMC", figure 3 says "Written 100% by Submitting Contributor (Non-Committer) and Submitted under the terms of the Project License (typically EPL)". |