Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 318395

Summary: [tcf] Fix and improve tracing of incoming CONF_SLAVES_INFO in java reference implementation
Product: [Tools] TCF Reporter: John Cortell <john.cortell>
Component: CoreAssignee: Project Inbox <dsdp.tm.tcf-inbox>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact: Martin Oberhuber <mober.at+eclipse>
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: cdtdoug, eugene, pawel.1.piech
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: 0.4.0   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows XP   
Whiteboard:
Attachments:
Description Flags
fix john.cortell: iplog+

Description John Cortell CLA 2010-06-29 19:23:57 EDT
Bug: each entry in an incoming CONF_SLAVES_INFO packet is  being logged as a distinct packet.

Improvement: dump the contents of an incoming CONF_SLAVES_INFO. I.e., show what slaves are being reported to us.
Comment 1 John Cortell CLA 2010-06-29 19:24:50 EDT
Created attachment 173053 [details]
fix
Comment 2 Eugene Tarassov CLA 2010-06-30 18:32:50 EDT
Committed. Thanks!
Comment 3 John Cortell CLA 2010-06-30 20:11:55 EDT
Eugene, I think the iplog flag is to identify contributions that are not from Eclipse committers. A patch from a committer in another project is considered equally "clean", I believe. I'm a committer on the CDT project.
Comment 4 Eugene Tarassov CLA 2010-06-30 21:14:05 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> Eugene, I think the iplog flag is to identify contributions that are not from
> Eclipse committers. A patch from a committer in another project is considered
> equally "clean", I believe. I'm a committer on the CDT project.
OK
Comment 5 Pawel Piech CLA 2010-06-30 23:38:18 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> Eugene, I think the iplog flag is to identify contributions that are not from
> Eclipse committers. A patch from a committer in another project is considered
> equally "clean", I believe. I'm a committer on the CDT project.

Nope, all contributions from non-committers to the given project need to be noted in the project's IP log.  If a project has multiple components with separate commit rights for each component (like platform) then you don't need to enter the contribution in the log.
Comment 6 John Cortell CLA 2010-06-30 23:45:04 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> Nope, all contributions from non-committers to the given project need to be
> noted in the project's IP log.  If a project has multiple components with
> separate commit rights for each component (like platform) then you don't need
> to enter the contribution in the log.

That doesn't make sense to me, as all committers are bound by the same set of  rules regarding IP, but certainly not worth further discussion. I'll revert the ipflag.
Comment 7 Doug Schaefer CLA 2011-05-17 10:49:18 EDT
Moving bugs to new home for IP log.
Comment 8 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2013-06-05 06:26:43 EDT
Bulk change: Marking all bugs from the TM era (until June 2011) target 0.3