Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Border Length values of lattice graph based scenarios not used in computation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Technology] STEM | Reporter: | Matthias Filter <matthias.filter> | ||||
| Component: | Disease | Assignee: | James Kaufman <jhkauf> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | ||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
In response to your comments in the call yesterday: If the values that are stored under the edge label "border length" are not used in the compartment model calculation I would suggest not to generate these labels at all. On the other hand the connections between lattice nodes are considered in the calculation otherwise one would not see any disease spreading. So maybe a solution could be to use the (relativephysical) Contains/Not Adjacent edge label instead. Graph Generator now uses specified area to set area, scale, border length etc.. Complete |
Created attachment 171534 [details] project archive It seams as if modifications in the value of the border length of edges within graphs that were generated with the lattice funtion of the graph wizard are not considered in the computation of the disease model - at least I could not see any difference when changing the value from 1 to 100 (node 2,2 in the attached project)for each of the 4 edges that connect the node 2,2 in comparison with node 7,7 were I left the original values of 1.