| Summary: | assembly feature being included in repo | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [WebTools] Dali JPA Tools | Reporter: | David Williams <david_williams> | ||||||
| Component: | General | Assignee: | Tran Le <tranle1> | ||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||||
| Priority: | P1 | CC: | neil.hauge | ||||||
| Version: | 2.3 | Flags: | david_williams:
pmc_approved+
neil.hauge: pmc_approved? (raghunathan.srinivasan) neil.hauge: pmc_approved? (naci.dai) deboer: pmc_approved+ tranle1: pmc_approved? neil.hauge: pmc_approved? (kaloyan) neil.hauge: review+ |
||||||
| Target Milestone: | 2.3 RC4 | ||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | PMC_approved | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
David Williams
I've taken the liberty of marking as 'P1' since I personally think should be fixed for our final build/repo, since "repos are forever" and it is hard, if not impossible, to remove features in subsequent service releases. I'll check if there are others. Yep, org.eclipse.jpt.tests.assembly.feature is also there. Only these from Dali are being included. Sorry I didn't catch earlier and/or pass along this info about empty build.properties files for assembly features. Hm, worse than I thought. All our assembly features are showing up in repos, using a "pure" P2 build. I think due to some recent changes in PDE build, instead of an empty build.properties, it needs to have an explicit, empty bin.includes= This it us in Orbit, also. I'm testing that now on a local build. Created attachment 171287 [details]
proposed patch
Well, sounds like it should be completely empty, after all. I think there's still a bug/change in behavior that will require some "post build" tweaking to remove some of our assembly features. I've documented the general bug/issue in PDE bug 310674 And will document our workaround of the general issue in our "p2izing" bug 315919 (But, these build.properties should be empty in any case, even if we were not doing the P2izing. Thanks, Created attachment 171295 [details]
proposed patch 2
Requesting PMC review for this change to make our assembly features consistent with others in WTP. Should be no real risk with this change. Checked in and released |