Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 314831

Summary: [pmi] Formalise the way "works with" CQs are entered
Product: Community Reporter: Glyn Normington <glyn.normington>
Component: Project Management & PortalAssignee: Portal Bugzilla Dummy Inbox <portal-inbox>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: barb.cochrane, janet.campbell, jeffmcaffer, jreimann, sharon.corbett, wayne.beaton
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)   
Whiteboard: stalebug

Description Glyn Normington CLA 2010-05-28 05:02:30 EDT
Either provide an option on the portal CQ entry form or provide a flag in the IPzilla which can be set to indicate "works with". This will provide a definitive statement of whether or not a CQ is "works with", regardless of possible back and forth discussions in the CQ comments. It will also enable searches and queries to focus on, or to avoid, "works with" CQs.
Comment 1 Barb CLA 2010-06-23 16:30:22 EDT
Hi Wayne,

Another one for our discussion.

Cheers,

Barb
Comment 2 Jens Reimann CLA 2014-08-29 04:22:59 EDT
Please think about that again!

Every time I am creating a new works with or pre requisite CQ is stumble again over my own feet not known what to enter.
Comment 3 Wayne Beaton CLA 2014-09-01 22:49:16 EDT
Moving to PMI (that's where CQs are created).
Comment 4 Eclipse Genie CLA 2016-08-22 16:41:07 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 5 Jens Reimann CLA 2016-08-23 02:58:47 EDT
Still open.
Comment 6 Wayne Beaton CLA 2017-03-16 13:10:03 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 509307 ***