| Summary: | Invalid extension of MessageConsole | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] Linux Tools | Reporter: | Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn> | ||||
| Component: | Systemtap | Assignee: | anithra <anithra> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | pmuldoon | ||||
| Version: | 0.5 | Flags: | anithra:
review?
|
||||
| Target Milestone: | 0.6.1 | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 313157 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jeff Johnston
Created attachment 171268 [details]
Extending IOConsole instead of MessageConsole
Jeff, please review this patch and consider whether or not it warrants inclusion for 0.6 (I'm leaning towards no but will listen to counter proposals). Comment on attachment 171268 [details]
Extending IOConsole instead of MessageConsole
Patch makes sense. The MessageConsole class extends IOConsole which is extendible so this is just using it directly. The IOConsole provides an IOConsoleOutputStream rather than a MessageConsoleOutputStream so the change to use the newIOConsoleOutputStream method also makes sense.
(In reply to comment #2) > Jeff, please review this patch and consider whether or not it warrants > inclusion for 0.6 (I'm leaning towards no but will listen to counter > proposals). The patch is sound from my investigation. It does not warrant inclusion in 0.6 because it doesn't cause an error if it is not in immediately and it is too close to the release. It should go into trunk after 0.6 is officially tagged. Thanks for the analysis, Jeff. Setting target milestone to 0.6.1. done |