Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 313666

Summary:	CQ search finds unapproved CQs and says they are previously approved
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Glyn Normington <glyn.normington>
Component:	IPZilla	Assignee:	Eclipse Foundation IPZilla inbox <foundation.ipzilla-inbox>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	barb.cochrane, janet.campbell, sharon.corbett, wayne.beaton
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
Whiteboard:
Bug Depends on:	311528
Bug Blocks:

Description Glyn Normington

2010-05-20 03:59:48 EDT

I used the "request" link to raise a 3rd party dependency CQ and the search (with text 4129) turned up the CQ 4129 which was not already approve. However, the results of the search are prefixed by the text "Previously approved CQs (click to reuse):" which is not the case. I think this is because the search function was changed recently as it was missing certain valid CQs and now it finds unapproved CQs.

Comment 1 Barb

2010-06-23 16:09:51 EDT

Related to bug311528.  

Wayne, I think this is one to add to our list of things to discuss.  :-)

Thanks.

Barb

Comment 2 Eclipse Genie

2014-05-11 01:43:26 EDT

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.

Comment 3 Eclipse Genie

2016-05-01 09:41:21 EDT

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.

Comment 4 Wayne Beaton

2017-03-27 12:39:17 EDT

The old CQ creator has been retired in favour of the "new" PMI-based implementation.

It is technically valid to create a piggyback on an unapproved CQ; the new implementation uses different wording.

I'm going to say that this is technically FIXED, because we took this into consideration while developing the current implementation.