Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 313251

Summary:	Name and ModelId are really confusing.
Product:	[Technology] Tigerstripe	Reporter:	Steve Jerman <sjerman>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	Project Inbox <tigerstripe.core-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	nmehrega, rcraddoc, valentin
Version:	0.5
Target Milestone:	0.5M0
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
Whiteboard:

Description Steve Jerman

2010-05-17 17:56:34 EDT

The introduction of modelId seems to have made the 'name' attribute obsolete in the tigerstripe.xml file. However, there are lots of loose ends:

1) The created project has "" for a name attribute.
2) artifact.getProject().getName() returns ""

Given were we are, I would suggest that getName() should return modelId. It would also be good to remove the XML stuff.

Comment 1 Navid Mehregani

2010-09-09 14:16:17 EDT

Bug#310049 is another defect that's effected by this.

Comment 2 Navid Mehregani

2010-09-09 14:18:18 EDT

another related defect: bug#311783

Comment 3 Richard Craddock

2010-11-30 07:27:14 EST

One problem area was that you cannot specify the modelId in the name of a global rule.

I have updated the Expander to take the following syntax:

${modelId} 

or 

${project.ModelId}

So you can now do this effectively.

Comment 4 Valentin Yerastov

2012-02-27 06:16:35 EST

Fixed

Comment 5 Navid Mehregani

2012-02-28 09:46:46 EST

Verified. Thanks!