Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 312667

Summary:	[pmi] Make the CQ cryptography field a little more tolerant
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Glyn Normington <glyn.normington>
Component:	Project Management & Portal	Assignee:	Portal Bugzilla Dummy Inbox <portal-inbox>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	barb.cochrane, daniel_megert, janet.campbell, nathan, sharon.corbett, srikanth_sankaran, wayne.beaton
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
Whiteboard:	stalebug

Description Glyn Normington

2010-05-12 12:47:41 EDT

I recently raised some CQs and put "No." in answer to the cryptography question. These CQs were then flagged as cryptography=yes until someone noticed and then we had them corrected.

Please consider allowing "No." as an alternative to "No" and perhaps allow other capitalisations too such as "no" and "no.".

This will avoid the same problem occurring in the future.

Comment 1 Barb

2010-06-23 16:05:25 EDT

Hi Wayne,

Are portal code changes yours, or should Webmaster be looking at this one?

Thanks.

Barb

Comment 2 Srikanth Sankaran

2013-03-18 08:17:10 EDT

I tripped into this too today while raising https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7122.

Comment 3 Nathan Gervais

2013-04-02 11:53:21 EDT

The new IPzilla module for the PMI no longer attempts to force this as a yes/no decision, the data entered will be repeated exactly as typed into the CQ comments when generated.

Comment 4 Eclipse Genie

2015-03-24 01:33:06 EDT

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.

Comment 5 Eclipse Genie

2017-03-14 20:13:34 EDT

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.

Comment 6 Wayne Beaton

2017-03-27 22:00:29 EDT

(In reply to Nathan Gervais from comment #3)
> The new IPzilla module for the PMI no longer attempts to force this as a
> yes/no decision, the data entered will be repeated exactly as typed into the
> CQ comments when generated.

It looks like we've been FIXED for a while...