Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 312497

Summary:	Please add a job for Ecore Tools
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Kenn Hussey <Kenn.Hussey>
Component:	CI-Jenkins	Assignee:	CI Admin Inbox <ci.admin-inbox>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	enhancement
Priority:	P3	CC:	d_a_carver, Ed.Merks, michal.ruza, stepper
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.)
Whiteboard:

Description Kenn Hussey

2010-05-11 15:49:54 EDT

Please add a new job for the Buckminster build of Ecore Tools (see bug 312486). The name of the job should be buckminster-emft-ecoretools-0.9-nightly and access should be given to Ed Merks (emerks) and Michal Ruzicka (mruzicka). Please also ensure that they are granted the 'Promote' role in Hudson.

Comment 1 Eike Stepper

2010-05-12 02:41:20 EDT

Sorry for jumping in (possibly in the wrong thread for this).

Can't we get rid of these "build system type prefixes"? I had a hard time to find the current emf core job as i was looking for something that started with "emf-...". I wonder what the value in this naming strategy is...

Comment 2 David Carver

2010-05-12 10:28:51 EDT

Eike we can create a view and put all the EMF related builds under there.

Comment 3 David Carver

2010-05-12 10:34:13 EDT

I've created an EMF View:

https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/EMF/?

Kenn, I'll see if I get to the rest of this request later today.

Comment 4 Kenn Hussey

2010-05-12 12:14:34 EDT

(In reply to comment #3)
> I've created an EMF View:
> 
> https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/EMF/?

Dave, there was already a "Modeling" view, which should be sufficient. For some reason, though, the Buckminster EMF job wasn't included in it. Perhaps you could discard the new "EMF" view and just ensure that the EMF job (and the new ones we will be requesting) is included in Modeling?

Comment 5 Eike Stepper

2010-05-13 02:08:36 EDT

Yes, I'm also fine with the existing Modeling view, now that the new emf bucky build is in there. What about excluding the disabled cbi builds now?

Comment 6 David Carver

2010-05-13 12:24:50 EDT

(In reply to comment #5)
> Yes, I'm also fine with the existing Modeling view, now that the new emf bucky
> build is in there. What about excluding the disabled cbi builds now?

What other jobs need to be added that are currently missing.

Comment 7 David Carver

2010-05-13 16:53:25 EDT

Okay, this has been created.  I copied the buckminster-emf build as the basis.