| Summary: | Empty "Make Builder" tab on the "C/C++ Make Project" property page | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Martin Oberhuber <mober.at+eclipse> | ||||
| Component: | cdt-build | Assignee: | cdt-build-inbox <cdt-build-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | Jonah Graham <jonah> | ||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | aniefer | ||||
| Version: | 7.0 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux-GTK | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Martin Oberhuber
Can you attach a screenshot? Created attachment 167137 [details]
Screenshot
Sure, no problem - screenshot attached.
I noted that on the "C/C++ Project Paths" page, the "Source" tab is also empty when bringing it up the first time.
On one occurrence, it seemed to me as if the page were painted at first but then overridden with empty content again; but I could be wrong.
The project type you are using was obsoleted with CDT 4.0. I think this one has little chance of fixing unless somebody contributes a patch and the change is straightforward. What would I need to do to upgrade the "org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.executable" project to the new project type? What would I need to consider? Or even better yet, could you file a bug against RT/Equinox/Framework, requesting updating the CDT project of o.e.e.launcher.executable, and attach a patch making the change? (In reply to comment #4) > What would I need to do to upgrade the "org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.executable" > project to the new project type? What would I need to consider? I can suggest to use wizard "Convert to a C/C++ Project" in C/C++ category of "New Project" wizards. > Or even better yet, could you file a bug against RT/Equinox/Framework, > requesting updating the CDT project of o.e.e.launcher.executable, and attach a > patch making the change? Perhaps it would be best if somebody familiar with this module and able to do regression testing on whatever it is supposed to do would do that. *** Bug 311897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |