| Summary: | suspend is ghosted - spawner.dll is not available for x64 machines | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Oyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe> |
| Component: | cdt-core | Assignee: | Project Inbox <cdt-core-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | aleherb+eclipse, pawel.1.piech |
| Version: | 0 DD 1.1 | Keywords: | helpwanted |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Oyvind Harboe
AFAIK the spawner.dll has not been available for win32 x86_64 before, so I assume this is an enhancement request to add it. I don't have access to a windows 64 bit OS, so it would be much appreciated if you could check out the spawner sources from CVS and build the binaries yourself. You need MinGW and JDK-1.5 to build it. (In reply to comment #1) > AFAIK the spawner.dll has not been available for win32 x86_64 before, so I > assume this is an enhancement request to add it. I don't have access to a > windows 64 bit OS, so it would be much appreciated if you could check out the > spawner sources from CVS and build the binaries yourself. You need MinGW and > JDK-1.5 to build it. Isn't it in the requirements that Eclipse CDT should work on x86 64? I don't use Eclipse on Cygwin myself, I only discovered that it is now broken. Just a personal opinion, but Windows 64 runs 32-bit applications so well, I'm not sure why you'd use the 64-bit version of Eclipse. We have already alerted the Eclipse gang that the CDT may not support 64-bit, and this would be the reason why. We're not committing to 64-bit Windows support. Depends if we get a contribution to support it. BTW, you need mingw64 and I'm not sure how stable that is. (In reply to comment #3) > Just a personal opinion, but Windows 64 runs 32-bit applications so well, I'm > not sure why you'd use the 64-bit version of Eclipse. > > We have already alerted the Eclipse gang that the CDT may not support 64-bit, > and this would be the reason why. We're not committing to 64-bit Windows > support. Depends if we get a contribution to support it. > > BTW, you need mingw64 and I'm not sure how stable that is. Customers are using it w/Cygwin. My opinion is moot at that point :-) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 236330 *** |