Bug 301887

Comment 1 Grant Gayed 2010-02-04 16:16:59 EST

Created attachment 158229 [details]
screenshot

- using the latest swt, happens on Ubuntu, works fine on RHEL4
- run the snippet below and note that the right edge of the item texts in the first two columns are clipped, screenshot is attached
- perhaps it's because column separator lines are being lightly drawn?

public static void main(String[] args) {
	Display display = new Display();
	Shell shell = new Shell(display);
	shell.setLayout(new FillLayout());
	final Table table = new Table(shell, SWT.NONE);
	table.setHeaderVisible(true);
	TableColumn column1 = new TableColumn(table, SWT.NONE);
	TableColumn column2 = new TableColumn(table, SWT.NONE);
	TableColumn column3 = new TableColumn(table, SWT.NONE);
	for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
		TableItem item = new TableItem(table, SWT.NONE);
		item.setText(new String[] {"item " + i, "hi", "there"});
	}
	column1.pack();
	column2.pack();
	column3.pack();
	shell.setSize(300, 300);
	shell.open();
	while (!shell.isDisposed()) {
		if (!display.readAndDispatch()) display.sleep();
	}
	display.dispose();
}

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2010-02-04 16:22:12 EST

Created attachment 158231 [details]
Fedora 12 screenshot

Comment 3 Praveen 2010-02-11 08:09:06 EST

I could reproduce the problem on Ubuntu. However, the columns are packed correctly when the lines are drawn.

Comment 4 Nam Quang Tran 2011-10-19 05:44:07 EDT

This problems seems to be slightly worse when the table is created with SWT.CHECK style.

Comment 5 Thomas Singer 2011-10-19 06:04:54 EDT

Created attachment 205488 [details]
SWT/JFace 3.7.1 on Ubuntu 11.10

Comment 6 Eric Williams 2017-07-28 09:34:29 EDT

(In reply to Thomas Singer from comment #5)
> Created attachment 205488 [details]
> SWT/JFace 3.7.1 on Ubuntu 11.10

Ping, is this still reproducible?

Comment 7 Thomas Singer 2017-07-31 03:06:32 EDT

The columns are now (tried SWT 4.756 on Ubuntu 16.04.2) large enough to not visually cut off some text. But double-clicking the table-header separators make them slightly larger, though.

Comment 8 Eric Williams 2018-08-23 12:21:29 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 531882 ***