| Summary: | TVT35:TCT571: plk_TVT Seven-segment display | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] GEF | Reporter: | CDE Administration <cdeadmin> | ||||
| Component: | GEF-Legacy GEF (MVC) | Assignee: | gef-inbox <gef-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | trivial | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | ahunter.eclipse, camle, kitlo, mgobeil, Oleksandr_Boyko | ||||
| Version: | 3.5 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows Vista | ||||||
| URL: | 571 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
CDE Administration
Created attachment 144698 [details]
12.000.030_siedmiosegmentowy.PNG
<cde:tctdetail> Testcase: 12.000.030 Project: WSW35 Component: Xfer - GEF/GEF Priority: 4 Subject: plk_TVT Seven-segment display Article ID: 571 Originator: tctbroadcast@pl.moraviaworldwide.com </cde:tctdetail> (In reply to comment #0) > Problem Description: > I spotted that you are using the name "LED" for the item which is electronic > device called "double seven-segment display". One seven-segment display is made > of 7 light-emmittng diodes (LEDs). A small mistake. Maybe it's worth changing? I suppose while this is technically correct, the LED term has been used in this GEF example for about ten years. It makes no sense to change at this point. |