Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 267726

Summary:

frequent hangs on startup

Product:

[Eclipse Project] Equinox

Reporter:

David Williams <david_williams>

Component:

Assignee:

Simon Kaegi <simon_kaegi>

Status:

RESOLVED DUPLICATE

QA Contact:

Severity:

normal

Priority:

CC:

d_a_carver, john.arthorne, simon_kaegi

Version:

unspecified

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows Vista

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
dump from latest startup hang	none

Description David Williams

2009-03-09 16:20:14 EDT

Recently, we've started to see frequent hangs when starting our JUnit tests on the PPC Eclipse build machine. 


Since "p2" is mentioned, thought I'd open the bug here. I'll attach full dump. 


   1207 1LKDEADLOCK    Deadlock detected !!!$
   1208 NULL           ---------------------$
   1209 NULL           $
   1210 2LKDEADLOCKTHR  Thread "Start Level Event Dispatcher" (0x101B1400)$
   1211 3LKDEADLOCKWTR    is waiting for:$
   1212 4LKDEADLOCKMON      sys_mon_t:0x10A13388 infl_mon_t: 0x10A133C0:$
   1213 4LKDEADLOCKOBJ      org/eclipse/equinox/internal/p2/engine/SimpleProfileRegistry@41239A90/41239A9C: $
   1214 3LKDEADLOCKOWN    which is owned by:$
   1215 2LKDEADLOCKTHR  Thread "Worker-0" (0x1068A100)$
   1216 3LKDEADLOCKWTR    which is waiting for:$
   1217 4LKDEADLOCKMON      sys_mon_t:0x1053F304 infl_mon_t: 0x1053F33C:$
   1218 4LKDEADLOCKOBJ      java/lang/Object@41269F48/41269F54: $
   1219 3LKDEADLOCKOWN    which is owned by:$
   1220 2LKDEADLOCKTHR  Thread "Start Level Event Dispatcher" (0x101B1400)$

Comment 1 David Williams

2009-03-09 16:22:25 EDT

Created attachment 128097 [details]
dump from latest startup hang

Comment 2 John Arthorne

2009-03-09 16:29:19 EDT

See bug 265994 comment 1. This was fixed last week.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 265994 ***

Comment 3 David Williams

2009-03-09 17:01:01 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> See bug 265994 comment 1. This was fixed last week.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 265994 ***
> 

Thanks John, I was hoping you'd say that. We'll move up to I20090309-0100

Comment 4 John Arthorne

2009-03-09 17:29:42 EDT

> We'll move up to I20090309-0100 

Egads, that's ancient! We've had two more builds since then! Just kidding, there were very few changes from p2 in the 0800 and 1300 builds today, so that should be fine.