| Summary: | Signing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson> |
| Component: | Eclipselink | Assignee: | Nobody - feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P1 | CC: | douglas.clarke, peter.krogh |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 252799 | ||
|
Description
Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Need to look at several factors: - Seems to require a UI (add to help). Not certain if feasible. - May cause a performance regression, is this required for runtime components? We will be shipping signed bundles. We are putting this in place. Completed changes to our process last Friday for an end-to-end automated signing solution. It's looking like I'll need to make some adjustments to compensate for some signing side-effects (not sign some non-galileo jars), but process is complete. closing. The Eclipselink project has moved to Github: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/eclipselink |