Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [formatter] Nested message argument should remain indented after preserving line break | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Philipe Mulet <philippe_mulet> | ||||
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | JDT-Core-Inbox <jdt-core-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P5 | ||||||
| Version: | 3.5 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | stalebug | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Created attachment 119890 [details]
Testcase
could be a dup of bug 258053 Note: line wrapping is set at 80 (In reply to comment #2) > could be a dup of bug 258053 > No, in this peculiar case, we have nested alignments, so it's easier for the formatter to know that an additional indentation should be added each time a new level is entered... Hmm, string concatenation also set enclosing alignment. So, this cannot be the only criterium to increase the indentation level... This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're closing this bug. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it and reopen this bug. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |
Version: 3.5.0 - Build id: I20081209-0100 With formatter preferences set to: org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.join_wrapped_lines=false org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.join_lines_in_comments=false The following code should remain unchanged after formatting: public class Test { int foo(boolean bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, boolean ccccccccccccccccccccccc, boolean ddddddddddddddddddd, int iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, int jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj, int kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk) { return foo(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, ccccccccccccccccccccccc, ddddddddddddddddddd, iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj, foo(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, ccccccccccccccccccccccc, ddddddddddddddddddd, iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj, foo(bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, ccccccccccccccccccccccc, ddddddddddddddddddd, iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj, foo( bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, ccccccccccccccccccccccc, ddddddddddddddddddd, iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj, kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk)))); } }