| Summary: | Name of generated variable name from methodName could be smarter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Tomasz Bartczak <kretes> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | JDT-UI-Inbox <jdt-ui-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | b.muskalla, daniel_megert |
| Version: | 3.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Tomasz Bartczak
Other user, other opinion :) I think this can be marked as dup of bug 251369 as I don't think that "this needs to be generalized to any verb in english language" can be implemented in such a general way. And seriously, Dani, I've nothing to do with this. But a remarkable coincidence. But this could be left configureable to the user - sometimes it is needed to have a var name from a factory name. like this one, when we already have a var with the 'normal' name. Adapter adapter = new Adapter(); Adapter xxx = copyAdapter(adapter); the second var should be 'copiedAdapter' - I think it's better than 'adapter2' or aAdapter or anything else. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 251369 *** |