| Summary: | [portal metadata to project summary mapping] How do you provide Description @ descriptionurl? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Nick Boldt <nboldt> |
| Component: | Process | Assignee: | Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P2 | CC: | bjorn.freeman-benson, denis.roy, karl.matthias, webmaster |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_summary.php?projectid=modeling.emf | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Nick Boldt
Phoenix has the same problem, and I just want to conform! :-) Ditto on the enthusiasm for the summary pages, BTW. Love 'em. Looks like some progress has been made here... http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/project-info/executive-summary.html maps directly to the Description field for http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_summary.php?projectid=modeling.mdt as that's the doc mentioned in the portal's 'summary url' field. However, 'summary url' is not (yet) mentioned here: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/project-status-infrastructure.php Glad you guys like the project summary pages! Admittedly we don't have enough documentation on the meta-data right now. We're working on it. What I think you've been seeing is some rather unclear logic in the code which looks first for 'descriptionurl' to be a fully-qualified HTTP URL. Failing that, it checks if 'summaryurl' is fully-qualified. Failing that, it tries to read the file in the relative web path for the project using the path in the 'descriptionurl' field. This is really kind of an ugly workaround for projects which had data in one of those fields but not the other. Ideally we would pick 'descriptionurl' and have everyone use that. I'm going to say that's the recommended place to put this, and when our documentation is more developed that's what it will say, too. I rigged up an image showing where all the fields come from. I'll work with Bjorn to get this or something like it into the documentation. It's here for now: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/images/project_summary_doc.jpg Re comment 3 - that wasn't actually how the code worked (I think there was a bug in there), so I cleaned up the logic and now it only uses descriptionurl. Re comment 4 - I took your idea and made a full-fledged annotated graphic: http://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/project-status-infrastructure-pic.php I added the missing periods. On the final item: could you open a new enhancement bugzilla for that and I'll whip it out - thanks. (In reply to comment #5) > > And while I'm asking for help and enhancement... could the wiki link(s) be > > added to the 'Project Web Site' box? > On the final item: could you open a new enhancement bugzilla for that and I'll > whip it out - thanks. You mean that one? OK, see bug 217871. |