| Summary: | Download page fails to recognize x86_64 architecture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | David Mohr <bugs> |
| Component: | Website | Assignee: | phoenix.ui <phoenix.ui-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | remy.suen |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux-GTK | ||
| URL: | http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
David Mohr
Actually, the download page *does* correctly identify your Linux x86_64 platform, but I guess I missed the memo that the packaging project was now producing Linux x86_64 packages (Eclipse itself has been running on Linux x86_64 for centuries, but the JEE/C++ IDE/etc packages were not available until recently). I fixed this. Almost working :-). So the main link, i.e. "Eclipse IDE for Java Developers - Linux x86_64 (78 MB)" is correct, but when I click on the right of that on "Linux" you still get the 32bit version. (In reply to comment #2) > Almost working :-). > > So the main link, i.e. "Eclipse IDE for Java Developers - Linux x86_64 (78 MB)" > is correct, but when I click on the right of that on "Linux" you still get the > 32bit version. That's intended -- we want the "top-3" platforms there, regardless of your current browser's architecture. Although we could change the label to "Linux 32bit" that would add significant clutter, when the same logic could also be said about the Windows link (Win32 vs. Win64). I'll re-close this as fixed, as everything is working as expected. Ok, if this is as intended... but from my point of view this is confusing. The Windows, Linux, Mac links to me seem to be labeled by the bigger text on the left, and thus I'd expect to also get the 64bit version under that Linux link. If you really want to keep it that way, could you maybe create a header for that "column", to the right of "Eclipse Europa Fall Maintenance Packages - Linux x86_64 (compare packages)"? That could provide clarification without cluttering up the page. |