| Summary: | interfaces don't show up in package's Type Hierarchy [type hierarchy] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Lee Breisacher <lbreisacher> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | JDT-UI-Inbox <jdt-ui-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | andreas.krueger |
| Version: | 2.0 | Keywords: | helpwanted |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 2000 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Lee Breisacher
This is impossible with a tree viewer since including interface results in a graph. There are no plans to provide a graph view in the type hierarchy for 2.1. Tagged as help wanted. Uh, I don't quite understand. If I select an interface and do "Open Type Hierarchy", it works fine. So eclipse CAN show an interface in a type hierarchy. Hmm, but in that case it shows the concrete classes that implement the interface as sub-nodes of the interface node in the tree. So, I guess I see the problem - the same concrete classes would be in two different places in the tree at the same time. Not fun. Well, how about this then: I would be happy if just the interfaces showed up the hierarchy WITHOUT showing the concrete implementing classes as subnodes. In fact, usually when I want to see an interface in a hierarchy, I don't really care about seeing the concrete implementing clases - I just want to see the hierarchy of the interfaces themselves. Would that be possible? Thanks! I would also like to see this (too bad Eclipse doesn't use Bugzilla's "vote for a bug" feature) and was just going to file this as a bug. Found this, mine would have been a duplicate. But isn't this a duplicate of bug 10613? |