| Summary: | [Javadoc] No validation needed for javadoc comments in anonymous class | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Eric Jodet <eric_jodet> | ||||
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | JDT-Core-Inbox <jdt-core-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P5 | CC: | frederic_fusier | ||||
| Version: | 3.4 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | stalebug | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Eric Jodet
Created attachment 79797 [details]
[test case] Sample project
better test case:
package pkg;
public class X {
/**
* @see invalid.type.Reference in a javadoc
* @return
*/
public boolean foo(java.util.List<Y> yList) {
yList.add(new Y() {
/**
*
* @see invalid.type.Reference in a javadoc
* @return
*/
public int foo = 1;
/**
* @see
* @param
* @param noParam validation not needed here
* @see invalid.type.Reference in a javadoc
*/
public void bar() {}
});
return true;
}
}
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |